1. Proposal Preparation
2. Award Management
3. Outgoing Subawards
4. Electronic Resources
5. Policies and Procedures
|5.1||What is a policy?|
|5.2||What is a procedure?|
|5.3||Who is responsible for maintaining UCLA polices?|
|6.1||What Internal forms are required for a UCLA submission?|
|6.2||Do I need a 700U or eDGE disclosure?|
|6.3||What is eDGE?|
7. Standard Institutional Information
|7.1||Does my PI need to register for their own DUNS number?|
|7.2||Do I or my department need to register with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)?|
8. Training Resources
|8.1||Is there any recurring training hosted by OCGA?|
|8.2||Are there any other recurring meetings that address Contract and Grant Administration?|
1. Proposal Preparation
1.1 How do I submit a proposal to OCGA?
All proposals requiring OCGA review and submission should be routed to the OCGA Proposal Intake Team firstname.lastname@example.org and must include the following subject line of the e-mail: "Proposal for Review: Sponsor Name, PI Name". For additional information, you may visit the Proposal Preparation page.
1.2 How close to a deadline may I submit a proposal to OCGA for review and institutional approval?
OCGA requests proposals be submitted for review and institutional approval five (5) business days in advance of the submission deadline. OCGA prioritized proposal for review by the order in which they were received by the Proposal Intake Team, email@example.com. Please keep in mind that your OCGA Officer or Analyst provides sponsored program services to a large number of units on campus, all of which are also submitting proposals. Thus, if a proposal is received after the lead times established for standard and non-standard proposals, OCGA may not be able to provide a complete review in advance of the sponsor's deadline.
1.3 How will I know if my proposal has been received by OCGA?
When proposals are received via OCGA Proposal Intake Team, firstname.lastname@example.org, the PI department/unit administrator will receive an acknowledgement via email within two to four business hours. That is to say, if a proposal is received after 4pm the acknowledgement email may not be issued until the next business day. The acknowledgment email is not automated and is created and sent as part of the OCGA proposal log in process.
1.4 Will the Contract & Grant Officer or Analyst assigned to my unit review my proposals?
In most cases, the Contract & Grant Officer or Analyst assigned to your unit will review your proposals. However, from time to time, OCGA Leadership may change the Officer or Analyst assigned to a proposal. This will typically occur when i) the Officer of Analyst assigned to your unit is out of the office; ii) to balance the proposal workload and to ensure that proposals are submitted prior to sponsor deadlines; iii) to ensure that complex proposals are reviewed by an Officer with the requisite knowledge and experience; or iv) when the reassignment of a proposal will help facilitate OCGA training.
1.5 What is the NIH Salary cap? And when do I use it?
For the latest information on the DHHS salary cap, please see Salary Cap Summary.
1.6 What is the indirect cost (F&A) rate?
An indirect cost rate represents the ratio between the total indirect costs and benefiting direct costs, after excluding and or reclassifying unallowable costs, and extraordinary or distorting expenditures. (i.e., capital expenditures and major contracts and subgrants). For additional information, you may visit the Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A) page.
1.7 How do I use the off-campus rate?
The off-campus rate should be used only when work is either done at facilities owned or leased by other organizations, or in a building for which rent is being directly charged to the project.
2. Award Management
2.1 Am I the award recipient or is it the University?
Awards made to UCLA are received in the name of The Regents of the University of California. Thus, the University is the recipient of the record.
2.2 What are the risks, liabilities and limitations of Pre-award Spending?
The risks, liabilities and limitations associated with pre-awarded spending must carefully considered prior to requesting authorization to spend funds in advance of receiving an award.
Risks: Whenever the University authorizes pre-award spending, the University is risking monetary loss. The Federal sponsor is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason the University does not receive an award or if an award is delayed or is less than anticipated and inadequate to cover such costs.
As such, the PI must identify alternate non-federal, unrestricted funding sources that are available to cover the risk of a delayed start date, costs potentially disallowed by the sponsor, or instances where a sponsor cancels the issuance of an award.
Liabilities: Special care must be exercised in assessing the impact of pre-award spending of the legal obligations of the University prior to requesting or approving advance spending. The University must consider the impact of not having a fully executed grant or cooperative agreement on its legal obligations regarding intellectual property rights, subject injury, indemnification, etc.
Limitations: A sponsor's policies, the terms and conditions of the anticipated award, and campus policies and proactive determine whether or not pre-award spending or pre-award activities are allowable. Restricting differ depending on the funding agency and the type of award anticipated. Additional information can be found in Policy 920.
2.3 What is TIF?
Technology Infrastructure Fee (TIF) is the monthly charge for university technology services based on the number of faculty, staff and student Full Time Equivalent (FTE) employees. Additional Information can be found at Technology Infrastructure Fee FAQs.
2.4 Who do I contact for gifts?
For gifts and gift related questions please contact UCLA Development.
2.5 My proposal has been awarded. When can I get a fund number?
A fund number being assigned is dependent on a multitude of factors including, but not limited to: Completeness of proposal file and compliance documents, complexity of the received award, responsiveness of the sponsor for negotiation of the agreement, volume of proposals to be submitted by OCGA to the sponsor. If all compliance, internal documents and finalized agreement are in place, then it can take up to three (3) business days for a fund number to be established.
2.6 Where can I see a copy of my award?
The ORA Online Resource Center is a web-based portal for UCLA's research community. It is a single point of access to research-related information and resources. It is intended to enhance overall communication between campus and central administration.
2.7 How do I get an extension on my award period?
The fact that funds remain at the expiration of the grant is not, in itself, sufficient justification for a no cost extension. First time requests and additional request have different handling and may be impacted by the terms and conditions of the award. For additional information, you may visit the Prior Approval Request page.
2.8 I have a PI that wants to transfer to another university. What do I do with their grants?
It is important to note that grants are issued out to the Regents of the University of California, and not the individual recipient. Given this, it is important to note that if the Principal Investigator has accepted a position at another University, they must work with their Department, their OCGA contact and the Sponsor in order to receive the approval to transfer the grant to their new institution. The criteria will vary by sponsor, so it is important to work with OCGA in order to understand the Sponsor’s guidance for transferring the award to a new institution.
2.9 I have a PI that will be transferring to UCLA. How do I transfer his grants?
It is important that the Principal Investigator work with their current institution and Sponsor in order to initiate the transfer of the award to UCLA. It is recommended that the initiation of the transfer be started earlier in the process as the transfer of the grants can take time. In some cases, OCGA may have to submit a proposal application for the transfer of the grant to UCLA.
3. Outgoing Subawards
3.1 What is an Outgoing Subaward?
When UCLA receives an incoming grant or cooperative agreement from a sponsor (sometimes referred to as "the prime"), and UCLA plans to work with a third-party entity (aka the subawardee or subrecipient) to perform a portion of the scope of work under that incoming agreement, UCLA uses an Outgoing Subaward. An Outgoing Subaward is a formal written agreement between UCLA and the subrecipient. The Outgoing Subaward outlines the subrecipient’s scope of work, which is expected to involve an intellectual level of effort, as well as the project/budget periods, funding arrangements and deliverables. The terms and conditions contained in UCLA’s incoming sponsored agreement are generally incorporated into the subaward agreement. Modifications to the terms being flowed down may be required depending upon the nature of the work being funded and the type of third-party entity involved. Subawards must be monitored to ensure that the subrecipient satisfactorily completes the scope of work and complies with the terms of the subaward. Note that a subaward is different from a subcontract, as well as from a vendor contract. See below for the differences between a subaward and a vendor/contract agreement. You can also use the following link to Third Party Definitions.
3.2 Why is it important to determine if the third-party entity that we plan to work with qualifies as a subrecipient? When should that determination be made?
The federal government, through the Uniform Guidance, requires that UCLA make a determination as to the type of work a third party is doing for UCLA. It’s also important to identify whether a third-party entity qualifies as a subrecipient, contractor/vendor, consultant, etc., at proposal stage because it impacts how UCLA will be working with the third party and how UCLA will be managing its project. The determination of that third party type could affect the selection process for the entity, the Facilities and Administrative costs of the project budget, the terms and conditions that UCLA flows down to the third party, and the office that will be handling the outgoing agreement.
3.3 How do I tell if the third-party entity qualifies as a subrecipient?
Some characteristics to look for, to help differentiate a subrecipient from a subcontractor or vendor, include:
- A subrecipient has a Principal Investigator who is responsible for making programmatic decisions;
- A subrecipient also carries out an intellectually significant portion of the scope of work included in UCLA’s scope of work.
For details on how to differentiate a subrecipient from a subcontractor or vendor, you can reference:
3.4 What is a Multi-Campus Award (MCA)?
A Multi-Campus Award (MCA) is an agreement that transfers a substantive portion of a project under an incoming grant, cooperative agreement, or contract to another UC campus. The UCLA OCGA Outgoing Subaward Team (OST) issues all outgoing MCAs under incoming grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts accepted by OCGA.
3.5 What subaward documents are needed at proposal stage?
When your proposal involves work with subrecipients, UCLA requires the following minimum documents for each subrecipient at proposal stage:
- Subrecipient vs Contractor Determination Checklist Form (UCLA PI completes)
- Subrecipient Commitment Form OR Letter of Intent (if FDP Expanded Clearinghouse member) (Subrecipient completes, UCLA PI provides)
- Subrecipient’s detailed statement/scope of work (SoW) (Subrecipient completes, UCLA PI provides)
- Subrecipient’s detailed line-item budget & justification (including cost-share budget-justification if applicable) (Subrecipient completes, UCLA PI provides)
TIP: To make sure that your subrecipient’s Commitment Forms are complete, please be aware that, depending on their answers to questions within the form, subrecipients may be asked to answer additional questions and / or to provide additional documentation. For example:
- If they will be using a negotiated indirect cost rate, the Subrecipient Commitment Form will ask them to provide a copy of their negotiated indirect cost rate agreement.
- If the subrecipient confirms via the Subrecipient Commitment Form that they are a for-profit entity, the UCLA PI should provide a copy of the Fair and Reasonable Cost Analysis.
- If the subrecipient does not have an annual audit completed in accordance with the Federal Uniform Guidance, the Subrecipient Commitment Form will ask them to provide a Financial Audit Management Questionnaire.
3.6 What MCA documents are needed at proposal stage?
When your proposal involves work with other UC campuses, UCLA requires the following minimum documents for each UC campus at proposal stage:
- MCA Commitment Form (or FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Letter of Intent) (Participating UC campus completes)
- Participating UC campus’s detailed statement/scope of work (SoW) (Participating UC campus completes)
- Participating UC campus’s detailed line-item budget & justification (including cost-share budget-justification if applicable) (Participating UC campus completes)
3.7 What is the Subrecipient Commitment Form and how is it used?
The Subrecipient Commitment Form provides a checklist of documents and certifications required by UCLA’s sponsors, to document subrecipient compliance with such things as human or animal subject regulations, conflict of interest disclosures, and Uniform Guidance audit requirements. It should be completed and signed by an authorized institutional representative of the non-FDP Expanded Clearinghouse subrecipient and provided at proposal stage with other proposal documents. Having the necessary data at the proposal submission stage puts the institution in compliance with federal regulations and expedites the issuance of subawards.
TIP: To make sure that your Subrecipient’s Commitment Forms are complete, please be aware that, depending on their answers to questions within the form, Subrecipients may be asked to answer additional questions and / or to provide additional documentation. For example:
- If they will be using a negotiated indirect cost rate, the Subrecipient Commitment Form will ask them to provide a copy of their negotiated indirect cost rate agreement.
- If the subrecipient confirms via the Subrecipient Commitment form that they are a for-profit entity, the UCLA PI should provide a copy of the Fair and Reasonable Cost Analysis.
- If the Subrecipient does not have an annual audit completed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, the Subrecipient Commitment Form will ask them to provide a Financial Audit Management Questionnaire.
3.8 What is the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Expanded Clearinghouse?
UCLA is participating in the national FDP Expanded Clearinghouse. In order to reduce the administrative burden related to incoming and outgoing subawards, participant institutions rely on institutional information from profiles housed on the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse website (ex. institutional information about F&A rates, fringe benefit rates, audit status, etc.). Instead of the Subrecipient Commitment Form, subrecipient institutions that are also participating in the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse should be asked to fill-out a FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Subrecipient Letter of Intent which addresses only project information. To see if your subrecipient is a member, visit the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse website.
3.9 Has the FDP released any sample pushback language for institutions that are not fully aware of participation in the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse?
Yes, see Suggested Push-Back Language
3.10 Is a Subrecipient Commitment Form needed when proposing a subaward with another UC campus?
No. When proposing a project that involves another UC campus, the MCA Commitment Form (or FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Letter of Intent) should be used instead. This is because all UC campuses are under the same legal authority as UCLA.
3.11 What should be included in the subrecipient’s statement of work (SOW)?
The subrecipient’s statement of work (SOW), to be completed by the subrecipient and reviewed by the UCLA PI, should include a clear description of the work to be performed, what the subrecipient expects to accomplish, and proposed timelines and deliverables.
3.12 Is there a resource that shows the proposal process step-by-step?
For a step-by-step process, you can reference the following Subaward Proposal Process guide.
3.13 How is the subaward packet entered in Cayuse when we submit an R01 grant with detailed budget?
See the UCLA OCGA ERA website for Cayuse S2S, particularly the Training Module 7 on Proposal Budgets – g-j on Subawards. If you have questions, the email address for S2S help is located on that page. Be on the lookout on the Monthly OCGA Training page for the trainings on Cayuse S2S. If you are not already on the ORA News ListServ, sign-up now at ORA Training Programs page.
New Subaward Stage:
3.14 When does the Outgoing Subaward Team handle an outgoing agreement?
The Outgoing Subaward Team handles:
- Outgoing subaward agreements made under incoming grants and cooperative agreements accepted by OCGA. (For guidance on determining if an agreement is a subaward vs a vendor contract agreement reference question #3 above).
- Multi-Campus Awards under incoming grants, cooperative agreements and contracts accepted by OCGA.
Information on whether your incoming award is a grant or contract can be found in the OCGA Award Snapshot.
Campus Purchasing handles:
- Contracts to vendors for the provision of goods and services to be provided to UCLA to accomplish the overall scope of work under an incoming grant, cooperative agreement or contract. (For guidance on determining if an agreement is a subaward vs a contract or vendor agreement reference question #3 above).
- Outgoing subcontracts made under an incoming contract received by UCLA.
3.15 After an award is made, how is a subaward established?
Subawards are not automatically initiated once UCLA's award is finalized. A subaward is only initiated after the department submits a subaward request package (aka a Subaward Checklist package) to the Outgoing Subaward Team (OST) central e-mail box at email@example.com.
The OST generally recommends that as soon as the department hears that its PI will be receiving an award, that it then review the collected subaward documents to see if anything is missing or needs to be updated. Then, when the department/PI receives notification from OCGA regarding the final setup of the award (i.e. when their fund number is setup), it should submit a Requisition to UCLA Purchasing via BruinBuy and submit the Subaward Checklist package (along with any other applicable backup documentation) to firstname.lastname@example.org requesting setup of their subaward.
TIP: The OST does not have access to BruinBuy. Outgoing subaward requests must be forwarded to the Outgoing Subaward Team (OST) central e-mail box at email@example.com.
3.16 What is the OCGA Subaward Checklist and how do I fill it out?
The OCGA Subaward Checklist is the form that the department uses to request a subaward action (new or amendment). Using the OCGA Subaward Checklist, the department communicates to the OST the start and end dates of the subaward, along with the amount of money to be awarded to the subrecipient, and any additional reporting requirements, etc.
For more information on how to fill out the Subaward Checklist, you can reference How to Complete the OCGA Subaward Checklist.
3.17 If the subrecipient’s scope of work includes work with human or animal subjects, what documentation do I need to send to the OST?
As the sponsored awardee, UCLA is responsible for all subject work, including confirming that our subrecipient's IRB/ARC approvals are in place prior to commencing work with subjects. The department is responsible for collecting those approvals (for reference, please see the OST’s Subaward Award Process guide). If submission of the checklist is being held up by the subrecipient’s IRB/IACUC approval, please reach out to the OST. The OST may still be able to begin working on the subaward agreement.
Exception: Since MCAs are for work with sister-campuses, IRB/ARC approvals for that participating UC campus do not need to be collected. Per UC MCA Policy "Participating Campus will ensure that all campus policies and prime sponsor terms and conditions, including as applicable COI, IRB, IACUC, or other ancillary approvals, have been met and followed. Appropriate approvals will be in place prior to commencement of any affected work, and that work will not take place outside of the approved period."
3.18 Does the subaward team have a portal for departments to check on the status of their subaward request?
The OCGA OST does not currently have a portal. When your requested action is assigned to an OST negotiator, the UCLA Department Contact, named on the Subaward/MCA Checklist, will receive an automated email informing them of the assignment and to who the Subaward/MCA transaction has just been assigned. For any other questions, feel free to reach out to OST’s Intake at OCGAsubawards@research.ucla.edu.
3.19 Does the OCGA Outgoing Subaward Team (OST) handle requests when the source of funding is an award such as a gift, departmental funding, or an award internal to UCLA?
Because of our delegation, the OCGA OST is only authorized to handle outgoing subaward agreements under incoming agreements that were handled by OCGA. The OST is not authorized to handle outgoing agreements under incoming gift funds, departmental funding, or internal awards. We recommend reaching out to Purchasing to see if they can help with the outgoing agreement. For further information, please visit the OST’s Subcontracts page.
3.20 What is subrecipient monitoring?
UCLA is required, by the Uniform Guidance and the UC, to monitor its subrecipients from initiation to closeout as if it were the sponsor. UCLA is responsible for ensuring that sponsor funds, including those provided by UCLA to third parties, are spent in accordance with all sponsor and UC terms, as well as applicable laws and regulations. UCLA is required not just to monitor but to document the monitoring.
3.21 When does the monitoring of subrecipients begin?
The process of monitoring a subrecipient begins at the proposal stage with the collection of the proposal documents from the subrecipient.
Prior to issuance of the subaward agreement, the OCGA OST evaluates each subrecipient institution’s risk of noncompliance. If risk is identified, additional terms or requirements (such as additional reporting, prior approvals, monitoring, invoices, etc.) may be added to the outgoing subaward agreement. The OST will continue to monitor the subrecipient institution annually during the life of the Subaward.
3.22 What is the department’s role in subrecipient monitoring?
All outgoing subawards must continue to be monitored to ensure that the subrecipient complies with the subaward terms. It is the responsibility of the UCLA PI/department to ensure the financial and programmatic monitoring of the project.
Financial monitoring involves departmental collection and review of invoices, financial reports, etc.
TIP: Federal terms and conditions have specific financial-monitoring requirements, so invoices from subrecipients under federally-funded projects need special attention.
- The monitoring/review of invoices from subrecipients needs to be documented.
- The OST recommends the departmental use of the UCLA Subaward Invoice Certification form as a means of documenting the review of invoices.
- Specific certification language is required to be included on subrecipient invoices (for reference, the OST has a sample invoice that includes that specific certification language available.
- UCLA is required to pay invoices within 30 calendar days after receipt of the acceptable billing. This means that there must be a timely review and approval or feedback on an invoice.
Programmatic monitoring involves departmental collection and review of any technical reports/deliverables, or other noted reports, which are required under the terms of UCLA's subaward agreement.
- Generally, subrecipient deliverables follow UCLA's sponsor requirements (ex. progress report, final report, etc.), with an exception being when the subrecipient is identified as Medium or High Risk. In the case of Medium or High Risk subrecipients, additional deliverables may have been included in the subaward agreement (ex. for high-risk entities, we may restrict carry forward even though our sponsor has not restricted UCLA carry forward).
- PI confirmation that subrecipient goals are being met is collected through the OCGA Subaward Checklist signature block.
3.23 Is there a resource that shows the award process step-by-step?
For a step-by-step process, you can reference the following Subaward Award Process guide.
3.24 How do I tell what deliverables are required from a subrecipient under an outgoing subaward?
Most of the OST’s subaward templates follow the same format. For basic technical reporting requirements, we recommend that the department reference Attachment 4 - Reporting and Prior Approval Terms. For further detail on whether a subrecipient is expected to complete specific project deliverables, the department can also reference the subrecipient’s Statement of Work (SOW), included as Attachment 5 in a standard OST subaward.
3.25 How do I tell if carryforward is allowed on an outgoing subaward?
The carryforward term on a standard OST subaward can be found on Attachment 4 under "Prior Approvals." The OST's general practice is to only include carryforward restrictions when UCLA's sponsor has partially or wholly restricted carryforward. When prior approval isn't required to carryforward funding under UCLA’s award, that automatic carryforward is flowed down to the subrecipient. An exception to this may be when the subrecipient is identified as Medium or High Risk.
3.26 How will I receive invoices from my subrecipient?
The terms of our subaward agreements require invoices to be submitted directly to the UCLA department invoice contact named on the Subaward Checklist. The UCLA Department contact named on the Subaward Checklist is noted as UCLA’s financial contact in the subaward on Attachment 3A of the standard OST subaward agreement.
If you’re having trouble receiving invoices, please reach out to the subrecipient’s financial contact noted in Attachment 3B.
3.27 For my MCA, how will I be receiving intercampus requests for reimbursement (IRRs) from the Participating Campus?
For MCAs, the department will see in the MCA terms that intercampus requests for reimbursement (IRRs) are submitted directly to EFM per UC Office of the President procedures (UCOP GM 14-08). In special circumstances, such as large complex projects, the UCLA department can request IRRs be submitted to the UCLA department at the same time, or before, going to EFM. Make sure to make this request in the MCA Checklist’s Comments section, with an explanation of why this is needed.
3.28 When does a subaward need to be amended?
The UCLA PI determines when a subaward should be amended. Common reasons for amending a subaward include providing additional funding, extending the period of performance, or modifying the reporting schedule. It is important to note that some changes, such as scope of work changes, changes in the subaward recipient's Principal Investigator or transferring the subaward from one recipient to another, may require the prior approval of UCLA’s sponsor. In those cases where prior approval is required from UCLA’s sponsor, the department will first need to submit its prior approval request through its OCGA Grants contact.
3.29 How do I initiate a request for a subaward to be amended?
For requests to amend an existing subaward, submit the OCGA Subaward Checklist, along with any other applicable documentation, to the OCGA Outgoing Subaward Team at firstname.lastname@example.org.
3.30 Can my amendment request include more than one action? For example, continuation funding and a carryforward approval?
Yes, the OST is generally able to accommodate more than one action on an amendment.
3.31 My NIH award has been renewed, do I need a new PO?
Yes, when an NIH award is renewed for a new competitive period, even if you are continuing work with the same subrecipients, the subaward agreement under the renewed NIH award is considered new and a new UCLA PO is required.
3.32 My subrecipient’s name has changed. What steps do I need to take?
Please reach out to Accounts Payable to see if a new PO will need to be issued for the subaward. If a new PO is required, you can notify the OCGA Outgoing Subaward Team at email@example.com.
3.33 My PI is transferring to another institution, what needs to happen with active subawards under my PI’s awards?
As soon as the department becomes aware that its PI is transferring institutions, it should reach out to its OCGA Grants contact to coordinate any necessary sponsor communications (see also #3.34 below).
3.34 My award is ending early. What do I do about the subawards under my award?
Please be sure to reach out to the Outgoing Subaward Team (firstname.lastname@example.org) to coordinate the early termination of any subawards/MCAs under any of your closing awards. A Subaward/MCA Checklist with the revised project dates can be forwarded to email@example.com to start the process. The following information will be helpful to the OST in the processing of the revised end dates:
- Is all work under the subaward expected to stop prior to the new end date?
- Are any new costs expected to be incurred after the new end date?
- Have any of the required final deliverables (including the final invoice) been collected from the subaward?
3.35 How is a subaward closed out?
If all deliverables have been collected and all invoices from the subrecipient have been paid, the department can request closeout of the subaward using the following Subaward Final Close-out Certification form. Once this Closeout Certification has been completed, please forward a copy to the firstname.lastname@example.org e-mail box. The OST will add the certificate to the subaward file and Purchasing (which has access to the email@example.com e-mail) will use the certificate to close the PO.
TIP: Once closed, a PO cannot be re-opened, so the PI and department should review the closeout to ensure all is in place before submitting the Closeout Certification.
4. Electronic Resources
4.1 Does my PI need to register for an account in Grants.gov?
No, applications are submitted through the University, and the institution already has an account with Grants.gov.
4.2 I can't find my PI in S2SGrants (Cayuse). What should I do?
If no Professional Profile exists for a UCLA PI or administrator, an administrator from the home department with existing access to S2S Grants (Cayuse) would create a Professional Profile in S2S Grants for the new user then request access. In order to ensure the most effective use of the system, a complete the Profile per the guidelines in the S2S Grants Business Processes and Procedures is necessary. When the Professional Profile is complete the administrator would then send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org confirming email address and UID number of the new user(s), OCGA eRA Help will then grant new user access.
4.3 I am signed into S2SGrants (Cayuse), but I do not see a specific proposal under the "Proposals" tab. What should I do?
If you are able to log in to the system and cannot see proposal you are looking for please click the “Show All” link. This will reveal any proposals you have permissions to as well as those you have not yet viewed. Alternatively, you can use the search function just under the tabs.
4.4 How do I get an NIH eRA Commons User ID?
To obtain an NIH eRA Commons User ID this is the basic information required to create an account:
- Full name
- UCLA email address preferred
- Commons ID role
- Does the individual have an existing Commons ID with another institution? If yes, then please give the existing Commons ID (if known) and/or the previous institution’s name. The account will then be affiliated with UCLA instead of a new account being created.
Once you have this information please send it in an email to OCGA eRA Help, email@example.com for account creation.
4.5 Do undergraduates, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers need an eRA account for RPPRs?
For guidance on whether or not an eRA Commons ID is necessary we would review the RFA or program solicitation and the NIH Grants Policy Statement. See the Specific guidance for the use of eRA Commons ID across roles.
Here is the important bit: “Progress Reports: On/after October 18, 2013, all graduate and undergraduate students reported on the All Personnel Form in the PHS2590 or the Participants Section (D.1) in the RPPR should have eRA Commons IDs in addition to the current requirement for postdoctoral researchers. A warning will be issued for all graduate and undergraduate students listed on the Participant List of the RPPR who do not have an eRA Commons ID. Beginning October 2014, RPPRs lacking an eRA Commons ID for graduate and undergraduate students will receive an error and the RPPR will not be accepted by the NIH without this information. eRA Commons IDs will be encouraged for all other individuals listed on the All Personnel Form or the Participants sections of those reports.”
4.6 My PI is using NSF Fastlane to prepare the proposal, am I able to log in an assist?
Yes, an Other Authorized User (OAU) account can be created for you by OCGA eRA Help. Using the Fastlane Proposal ID (system generated) and Proposal PIN (created by PI), administrators and assistants can log into NSF Fastlane to help prepare proposals.
5. Policies and Procedures
5.1 What is a policy?
A policy is a governing principle that mandates or constrains actions.
5.2 What is a procedure?
A Procedure defines the implementation of a policy. Procedures are a step-by-step description of the tasks required to implement organizational policies. Procedures are freestanding documents often located on departmental or sponsor websites. A quick comparison between a policy and procedure can be found in the UCOP Policy Development Toolkit.
5.3 Who is responsible for maintaining UCLA polices?
The UCLA Administrative Policies & Compliance Office is responsible for maintaining UCLA Policies. More information can be found at the Policies and Delegations website.
6.1 What Internal forms are required for a UCLA submission?
In addition to the federal and state required financial interest disclosures, UCLA OCGA maintains and operates using the Extramural Proposal Approval and Submission Summary (EPASS) form, the form and its instructions can be found on the Forms page.
6.2 Do I need a 700U or eDGE disclosure?
Correctly disclosing any financial interests or conflicts of interest is a very important aspect of compliance. Research Policy Compliance office maintains a decisions matrix and the forms for UCLA use.
6.3 What is eDGE?
In accordance with revised PHS financial disclosure regulations, the Office of Research Policy and Compliance (RPC) developed the Electronic Disclosure Gateway (eDGE). Effective August 24, 2012, eDGE replaced the 740 form as the method for disclosing financial interests for projects submitted to PHS or to sponsors that have adopted PHS policy. (Please note: The 740 form is still required for NSF and other federal sponsors.) As before, those required to submit through eDGE are the PI and all others who share responsibility for design, conduct, or reporting of the results of a sponsored project. For more information regarding PHS conflict of interest regulations, please see Frequently Asked Questions on the PHS COI Regulations.
7. Standard Institutional Information
7.1 Does my PI need to register for their own DUNS number?
No, applications are submitted through the University, and the institution already has its own DUNS number. UCLA's DUNS number is 092530369.
7.2 Do I or my department need to register with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)?
No, UCLA is registered with the CCR. This registration uniquely identifies UCLA and UCLA's key business officials to the federal government. It will be used by the federal government to help complete some data reporting elements and to disseminate information about these reports. For additional information, you may visit the UCLA Standard Information page.
8. Training Resources
8.1 Is there any recurring training hosted by OCGA?
Yes, Monthly OCGA Training. Presented by subject matter experts, this training opportunity offers monthly, 90 minute sessions on focused topics of interest to the UCLA research administration community. For additional information, you may visit the Monthly OCGA Training Calendar page.
8.2 Are there any other recurring meetings that address Contract and Grant Administration?
Yes, the Research Administration Forum (RAF) hosted by Associate Vice Chancellor Marcia Smith. More information on the RAF can be found on the RAF web page.
Page Last Updated: April 6, 2022